Dochitect speaks at HUBweek 2018 in Boston as part of the Change Maker Conference event!

How Architecture Impacts our Health: Design Thinking for Medicine

The delivery and design of healthcare today is rapidly changing, and increasingly complex. How are we closing the gap between design intent and user experience? Through combined thinking, research-based design has expanded to understand and improve the experience within healthcare spaces. For some patients, design can succeed where drugs may fail. For clinicians, the built environment can support and improve efficient care delivery. Healthcare innovation can occur where architecture and medicine meet.

Dochitect spoke at HealthAchieve in Toronto for the annual Capital Planning session along with Architect Tye Farrow on Process Design to Achieve Transformation Outcomes!

Read more about dochitect’s ideas on the ways clinicians and architects can find a balance between illness, health, and design in this article leading up to the talk entitled ‘Getting it right: merging medicine and architecture‘

Click here to watch this short video for a preview on what Dochitect will be discussing at the conference!

Process Design to Achieve Transformative Outcomes

How might we re-envision the hospital going forward?

Designers can walk the halls and talk to clinicians, but it can be challenging to learn the intricacies of a profession and its details of practice. Hybrid professionals can provide integrated solutions which cross disciplines in new ways, thus bridging this gap. Encouraging architects to experience medicine from a perspective that is typically hidden and allowing physicians to realize how design can create a context for participation would allow for a deeper understanding of health care delivery. By applying design-thinking to medicine, multidisciplinary approaches for solving current health care challenges can be developed.

Can architectural design impact health care delivery?

A 1984 study changed the way architects design health care spaces. Post-operative patients assigned to a room with a nature view had shorter hospital stays, took fewer analgesics and received fewer negative evaluative comments. This marked the advent of Evidence-Based Design (EBD), now standard practice in health facility design. Architects moved away from design decisions based solely on tradition or opinion, and towards built environments grounded in credible research to achieve the best possible outcomes- analogous to physicians utilizing evidence in making patient care plans. EBD research has demonstrated that design interventions can impact patient outcomes by decreasing iatrogenic infections, medical errors, and length of hospitalization. The business case demonstrates ongoing operating savings when the market share impact of EBD interventions is realized.

What is the model for architects and clinicians to work together towards a common goal of evidence-based practice? 

Despite this shift towards evidence-based practice, hospitalization can often result in complications unrelated to the reason for admission, followed by an irreversible decline in functional status and quality of life. Certain aspects of hospital design can contribute to this decline. Although there is no therapeutic value to bed rest, patient rooms have remained focused around the bed. How can we re-envision design to shift the focus to early mobility? Design guidelines set minimum standards for single-patient rooms given evidence for improved privacy, infection control, and quality of care. How can design find a balance between privacy and easy physical and visual accessibilities? Research has demonstrated that certain room layouts are more conducive to clinician interactions and therefore improved teamwork. Should we begin to move away from a one-size-fits-all model for patient room design?

It may be time to disrupt our current thinking and reinvent best practice design trends.

Can we leverage architectural design to solve health care challenges?

Despite the inclusion of clinicians into the design and construction process, there remains disconnect between the initial vision of those who design the hospital and final clinical use of the space.