Dochitect
Menu
  • Home
  • Dochitect Bio
  • The Physician-Architect Model
  • Articles & Publications
  • Presentations
  • In the News
  • Contact

Articles and Publications

Built Environment Design Interventions at the Exits of Secured Dementia Care Units: A Review of the Empirical Literature

October 9, 2022 / Dochitect / Design for Geriatrics, Evidence-Based Design

Peer-reviewed publication

Publication: Health Environments Research and Design
Publication Reference: 2022 Oct 9;19375867221125930. doi: 10.1177/19375867221125930.
Authors: Anderson DC, Kota SS, Yeh L, & Budson AE
Date: October 9, 2022. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Purpose: To review evidence around design interventions that influence exiting attempts in dementia care units, informing architectural and clinical practice.

Background: Built environment design is recognized as important in the care and management of responsive behaviors for those living with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias in secured dementia care units (e.g., exiting attempts, agitation). The repetitious behavior of “walking with purpose” (previously termed wandering) in those with dementia has influenced safety-related architectural design components of dementia care units that decrease exiting attempts. Empirical literature addressing design interventions to prevent exiting for those with dementia is lacking and outdated.

Methods: We sought to describe known design techniques through a topical analysis of experimental studies. A thorough search for empirical studies that assessed interior design interventions at exit doors within dementia care units was undertaken. The review included an extensive search for existing literature and a screening of each study identified for its relevance, quality, and applicability.

Results: The experimental studies included in the review collectively assessed five interior design interventions at egress doorways: implementing horizontal and vertical floor grid patterns, mirrors, murals, conditioning responses to color cues, and camouflaging door hardware or vision panels. Why empirical studies have not continued more recently as built environment trends have shifted toward promoting meaningful and purposeful movement through design are considered. Advances in our understanding around the pathophysiology of dementia which might affect future design interventions related to egress are also identified.

Conclusion: The built environment is an important part of dementia care, and further prospective research is needed on the role of design interventions in the context of exiting attempts within secured units and subsequent behavior outcomes.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Built environment design; architecture; dementia; long-term care; nursing home; visual barriers; wandering.

Find the full article HERE.

Peer-Reviewed Publications

HERD Editorial: Evidence, Bioethics, and Design for Health

May 5, 2022 / Dochitect / Health Design & Ethics

Peer-reviewed publication

Publication: Health Environments Research and Design
Publication Reference: 2022, Vol. 15(2) 13-21
Author: Hamilton, DK

Editorial Excerpt

I like to tell my students that if there is compelling evidence that if design can improve clinical outcomes and patient safety, then healthcare architects have a moral and ethical responsibility to utilize such evidence. This is only a small step beyond every licensed architect’s obligation to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. Similarly, I propose that if credible evidence links design and outcomes, institutional boards and their executives have a moral obligation to engage architects, engineers, designers, and consultants who can and will effectively use such evidence

My colleague, Ray Pentecost, recently told me of a set of conversations he was having with friends about bioethics and responsibility as related to design evidence. It is a self-initiated, multidiscipline, and regionally distributed group including architects, physicians, and ethicists. The group’s overall focus adds a bioethics lens to the application of evidence in the health design field. They have been working for more than 2 years at the intersection of healthcare design and bioethics in order that healthcare environments and the way they are experienced can be markedly improved. The group perceives that despite well-intentioned healthcare administrators, architects, physicians, and others, the idea of connecting a strong, common ethos to a data-driven framework and research informed design for health has been slow to develop in comparison to other professions. Their ideas have slowly grown based on dialogue, publications, and presentations.

Pentecost (2022a) has produced an HERD guest editorial about the Union Internationale des Architectes Public Health Group (UIA/PHG) declaration of 2022 as the Year of Design for Health in our last issue. The group has an article published in Health Facilities Management (Hercules et al., 2022) and a piece in the Hastings Center Review (Anderson et al., 2022) and blog (Anderson et al., 2021). Hearing of their conversations led me to want to hear more. We arranged for some conversations on Zoom to further explore their ideas.

Figure 1. January 9, 2022, L to R, top to bottom; Hercules, Hamilton, Deemer, Pentecost, Anderson, Guenther, and Teti.

Read the full editorial HERE.

Peer-Reviewed Publications

The Bioethics of Built Space: Health Care Architecture as a Medical Intervention

May 1, 2022 / Dochitect / Health Design & Ethics

Peer-reviewed publication

Publication: The Hastings Center Report
Publication Reference: March-April 2022, https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1353
Authors: Diana C. Anderson, Stowe Locke Teti, William J. Hercules, David A. Deemer

Abstract

Decisions made in health care architecture have profound effects on patients, families, and staff. Drawing on research in medicine, neuroscience, and psychology, design is being used increasingly often to alter specific behaviors, mediate interpersonal interactions, and affect patient outcomes. As a result, the built environment in health care should in some instances be considered akin to a medical intervention, subject to ethical scrutiny and involving protections for those affected. Here we present two case studies. The first includes work aimed at manipulating the behavior of persons with neurocognitive impairments, often in long-term care facilities. This is done to ensure safety and minimize conflicts with staff, but it raises questions about freedom, consent, and disclosure. The second concerns design science in service of improved outcomes, which involves research on improving patient outcomes or the performance of health care teams. There is evidence that in some ICU designs, certain rooms correlate to better outcomes, giving rise to questions about equity and fairness. In other cases, a facility’s architecture seems to be putting a finger on the scale of equipoise, raising questions about the intentionality of clinical judgment, freedom of choice, and disclosure. As a result of this innovation occurring outside the boundaries of traditional care delivery and oversight, important ethical questions emerge concerning both the individual patient and patient populations. We discuss, analyze, and make recommendations about each and suggest future directions for these and related issues.

Read more HERE!

Peer-Reviewed Publications

Architecture and Bioethics: A new value proposition for health care facility designers

February 5, 2022 / Dochitect / Health Design & Ethics

Commentaries

Publication: Health Facilities Management Magazine
Publication Date: February 5, 2022
Authors: William J. Hercules, Diana C. Anderson, Stowe Locke Teti, David Deemer
View article

Excerpt:
“Johann Goethe, the 18th Century polymath, once remarked, “Architecture is frozen music,” by which he meant architecture interprets and expresses the values of its time — sometimes in a general epoch and sometimes at a very precise point. Experienced health care architects will appreciate this phenomenon, as current project drivers may have eclipsed those of decades past. It is in precisely this context that designers are studying the decisions and tradeoffs that result from these normative preferences.

In health care architecture, design is being increasingly employed to affect patient outcomes, alter specific behaviors and mediate the interactions of those within health care spaces. The advances in design science have progressed to the point that the built environment in health care can be considered akin to medical interventions. And, as with medical interventions, the nature, risks, benefits and alternatives should be disclosed to patients and caregivers.

The ethics of buildings and construction typically involve environmental impacts and social equity of the built environment. And while these are important, the focus of this article is on the health care setting itself and how it affects patients, families and health care teams. While some of these effects bear on individual patients, such that an informed consent process may be sufficient, others have a population-level impact that will persist for generations, well after the designer’s direct influence.

Focused work in medicine, neuroscience and psychology is being employed to several ends but, to date, there has been little investigation of these practices. This is because the elements affecting control are neither providers nor medications, but the health care facility building itself. Broadly, this raises issues about the nature of the built environment, what constitutes a medical intervention, what architecture is expected to do and, importantly, what obligations emerge from designers’ choices.”

Read the full article HERE.

Commentaries

No Place Like Home: As the pandemic proved, long-term care homes are a health hazard

September 1, 2021 / Dochitect / Design for Geriatrics, Design for Resiliency

Commentaries

Publication: Zoomer Magazine
Date: Published in print and online Aug/Sept 2021
Author: Nora underwood
View Article

As the COVID-19 pandemic proved, long-term care homes are a health hazard. In this Zoomer Article, Nora Underwood investigates how better building design can help.

Excerpt: For Dr. Diana Anderson, design is a parameter of care, as important as other determinants of health, such as where you live and what you eat. “We don’t talk about that a lot, but buildings have a huge impact on us,” says Anderson, a Boston-based doctor and architect who calls herself a “dochitect.” “It’s almost akin to a medical intervention. It has that much of an impact on people.”

Read the full article HERE.

Commentaries

Designing for Healthcare Sustainability: A Framework

August 3, 2021 / Dochitect / Design for Resiliency, Design for the Future of Health

Blog Post

Publication: American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE)
Title: Designing for Healthcare Sustainability: A Framework
Date: Published online August 3, 2021
Author: Diana Anderson, Principal, Jacobs & Shari Blanch, Architectural Graduate at Jacobs
View article

Excerpt:

Traditionally, concepts related to sustainable design focus on the co-existence of both the natural and the built environments, often conjuring up images related to saving our earth: planting trees, building wind farms, collecting pollution from the ocean. Over the last few decades, the concept of sustainability has gained traction in the design community with building rating systems and standards alongside the emergence of professional credentialing.

There is a recognized need to expand the facets of holistic, sustainable design given the complex challenges within healthcare. Usually, three pillars of sustainability are considered to include economic, social and environmental dimensions. In this blog post, we propose and describe a fourth: systems sustainability.

The traditional pillars of sustainability: social, environmental and economic, in addition to systems sustainability in the context of healthcare. Sketch by: Shari Blanch

Read the full article HERE.

Blog Post

Designing The Hospital Of The Future

March 17, 2021 / Dochitect / Design for the Future of Health

Blog Post

Publication: Medical Futurist
Date: Published online March 17, 2021
Author: Diana Anderson, Principal, Jacobs & Cath Lewin, Senior Health Planner at Jacobs
View article

What would someone do who equally loves medicine and architecture? For Diana Anderson, it was simple: she became the world’s (probably) first dochitect: doctor + architect. As a published author in both fields, she creates hospital design projects globally, and shifts the paradigm on both ends, focusing on the impacts of healthcare design on patient outcomes, staff satisfaction, and related topics.

As we immerse ourselves in the operation of the hospitals on The Medical Futurist site in the coming weeks, we asked Diana what she thought the hospitals of the future would look like. She gave us responses together with Cath Lewin, Senior Health Planner at Jacobs.

“The complexity of the current pandemic has led to successful inter-disciplinary alliances between designers, architects, engineers, public health officials, health facility operators, and others to work together on design-related solutions.”

Concept sketch for healthcare public space. Sketch by: Jorge Anaya, Jacobs

Read the full article HERE.

Blog Post

Hastings Center Bioethics Forum: The Bioethics of Built Health Care Spaces

January 13, 2021 / Dochitect / Health Design & Ethics

Blog Post

Publication: Hastings Center Bioethics Forum
Title: The Bioethics of Built Health Care Spaces
Publication Date: January 13, 2020
Authors: Diana Anderson, Bill Hercules and Stowe Locke Teti

View Blog Post

It is time for the built environment to be considered alongside other parameters of care.

In recent decades, our understanding of the role the environment plays in shaping us and our interactions has expanded immensely. Researchers have examined the profound effect social and environmental factors can have on ethical behavior and decision-making. Yet, design choices in the built health care environment raise substantive bioethical issues that demand the attention of bioethicists and ethical inquiry.

Read the full essay HERE.

Blog Post

How will COVID-19 Change Healthcare Design?

January 1, 2021 / Dochitect / Design for Infection Control, Design for Resiliency

Commentaries

Publication: Design Museum Magazine
Date: Published in print and online Winter 2020
Author: Diana Anderson, MD, ACHA & Matthew Holmes, ARB, RIBA
View article

Globally, the COVID-19 pandemic has tested the overall resilience of our health system infrastructure to cope with increased demand. It has also brought the importance of design and the built environment to the forefront when considering emergency preparedness and infection control.

Now, nine months into the pandemic, there have been lessons learned from the immediate challenges of medical facility design, in addition to ongoing discussions of the long-term changes which are likely to impact how, where, and when we access our care.

Read the full article HERE.

Commentaries

JHD Editorial – Widening the lens: Clinical perspectives on design thinking for public health

November 25, 2020 / Dochitect / Design for Clinical Staff, Design for Patient Safety, Design for Resiliency

Peer-reviewed publication

Publication: The Journal of Health Design
Publication Reference: Vol 5, No 3 (2020): The Year Like No Other
Authors: Bassin BS, Nagappan B, Sozener CB, Kota SS, Anderson DC

Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has created opportunities for innovation, ingenuity, and system reengineering. The next big investment in health care should be intentional and embedded partnerships between clinicians, designers, and architects who can collaborate to help solve health care’s greatest challenges.

“We think it is time to support a paradigm change and advocate for healthcare’s next big investment: intentional and embedded partnerships between clinicians, designers, and architects with dedicated resources to ensure an effective collaborative environment to help solve healthcare’s greatest challenges.”

Read the full editorial HERE.

Listen to the podcast with the authors HERE.

Peer-Reviewed Publications
123›»

A Book from Dochitect

The Dochitect’s Journal: A collection of writings on the intersection of Medicine and Architecture

Find out more here.

Search

Recent Articles/Publications

  • Built Environment Design Interventions at the Exits of Secured Dementia Care Units: A Review of the Empirical Literature

    October 9, 2022
  • HERD Editorial: Evidence, Bioethics, and Design for Health

    May 5, 2022
  • The Bioethics of Built Space: Health Care Architecture as a Medical Intervention

    May 1, 2022

Recent Presentations

  • Harvard Medical School Center for Bioethics: If Architecture Influences Health Outcomes, How Should Healthcare Systems Respond? Bioethics at the Frontier of the Science of Design

    January 20, 2023
  • UT Southwestern Ethics Grand Rounds: Exploring the untapped nexus of ethics and health facility design

    January 10, 2023
  • The Center for Health Design EBD Journal Club: Built Environment Design Interventions at the Exits of Secured Dementia Care Units

    December 8, 2022

Publication Type

  • Blog Post
  • Book
  • Book Chapter
  • Book Review
  • Commentaries
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Peer-Reviewed Design Guidelines
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications

Presentation Type

  • Conference Presentations
  • Keynote Presentations
  • Lectures
  • Panel Discussions
  • Podcasts
  • Webinars

Design Topics

  • Commentaries & Event Reviews
  • Design for Clinical Staff
  • Design for Critical Care
  • Design for Geriatrics
  • Design for Infection Control
  • Design for Palliative Care
  • Design for Patient Safety
  • Design for Resiliency
  • Design for the Future of Health
  • Dochitect in the News
  • Evidence-Based Design
  • Health Design & Ethics
  • The Physician-Architect Model

Archives

Follow Dochitect

Follow me on:

** ©2023 Dochitect :: Site by KPFdigital :: Admin Login